HR HQ

Discussions on real world examples that impact the HR professional. Brought to you by the Labor and Employment Team at Hunter, Smith & Davis, LLP

Friday, October 1, 2010

ICE means business

Just ask Abercrombie & Fitch:

http://www.laborlawyers.com/shownews.aspx?Abercrombie-Fitch-Fined-1-Million-After-I-9-Audit&Ref=list&Type=9871&Show=13290
Posted by Laura A. Steel at 9:41 AM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: fine, I-9, ICE audit

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Subscribe To HR HQ

Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments

Blog Archive

  • ►  2014 (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2013 (1)
    • ►  October (1)
  • ►  2012 (7)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2011 (42)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ▼  2010 (44)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ▼  October (7)
      • Severe weather policies: not just for winter any more
      • Does no more free checking mean no more direct dep...
      • Maintaining perspective: we can learn from our cli...
      • Optional and IRS--not a pairing you hear everyday
      • Come and knock on our door. . .
      • No hiding behind the veil
      • ICE means business
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2009 (31)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2008 (37)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (2)

Disclaimer

No Attorney Client Relationship. We provide this blog for general information purposes only. Because Hunter, Smith & Davis LLP is a law firm and some of the information on the blog relates to legal topics, we want you to understand that we do not create an attorney client relationship with you when you are using the blog. By using the blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and Hunter, Smith & Davis LLP. Do not consider the blog to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your state. The information on the blog may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise the blog on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed at or through the blog are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.

Contributors

  • Joseph B. Harvey
  • Mike Eastridge
  • Steve Darden
  • William Godsey
Awesome Inc. theme. Powered by Blogger.